Peer-reviewing process

The peer-review of the articles submitted to the editors is carried out in two stages: initial and independent.

Initial peer-review implies a primary review of the manuscript by editors for its compliance with the subject matter and journal requirements.

Independent peer-review implies expert assessment of the manuscript by recognized experts on the subject of the reviewed materials. In the process of independent peer-reviewing in our publishing house the manuscript undergoes double-blind review, i.e. neither the authors nor the peer-reviewers know each other. The manuscript is considered by 2 peer-reviewers.

The independent Peer-review is carried out in accordance with the foregoing provision of the independent Peer-review.

Provision of the independent Peer-review

1. General provisions

1.1. The present Regulation on the process of Peer-reviewing manuscripts intended for publication in the academic journal is an integral part of editorial policy LLC "Scientific Cooperation Center "Interactive plus" (hereinafter - the "Publisher"), which defines manuscripts expert assessment procedure to ensure high quality and depth of the content of published academic journal.

1.2. Regulations on the process of Peer-reviewing regulates the relationship of the Author(s) of materials with absolute observance of main provisions of academic publication ethics.

1.3. According to the articles 3.1 and 3.2 the Peer-review is conducted in the format of confidentiality.

journal/reviewing.2_порядок_и_сроки_рецензирования

journal/reviewing.2_1_рецензирование_имеет_двойной___

journal/reviewing.2_2_для_передачи_на_рецензирование___

journal/reviewing.2_3_Привлекаемые_компетентные_специалисты___

journal/reviewing.2_4_Копирование_рецензентами_материалов___

journal/reviewing.2_5_срок_рецензирования_составляет___

journal/reviewing.3_требования_к_содержанию_рецензии

journal/reviewing.3_1_рецензия_представляет_собой___

journal/reviewing.3_2_экспертная_оценка_качества_рукописи___

  • accordance of the content with the title;
  • general analysis of the level of the scientific content of the paper, novelty, terminology and structure of the publication, the relevance of the topic and the significance of the problem; theoretical and practical components of the study;
  • the authenticity of described facts; completeness of study material;
  • assessment of preparedness of the manuscript for publication in respect of the language and the style, accordance of the manuscript materials to the requirements; presence of links on the bibliography used and other sources of information;
  • compliance of the methods applied by the Author, guidelines and research results to modern science and practice achievements;
  • the practicability and feasibility of various illustrative materials given in the manuscript;
  • correctness of the results received;
  • correlation of the Authors' conclusions correlation with existing scientific concepts;
  • clarity of reasoning and argumentation; the accuracy and validity of the final findings correlated with the goals and objectives of the study;
  • evaluation of author's personal contribution in the research of problem solution;
  • identification of the author's shortcomings, inaccuracies and errors.

journal/reviewing.3_3_рецензия_должна_включать___

journal/reviewing.3_4_оформленная_в_письменном_виде_рецензия___

journal/reviewing.3_5_рецензия_предоставляется_в_свободной_форме___

journal/reviewing.4_порядок_представления_рецензии_Авторам

journal/reviewing.4_1_Издательством_рецензия_направляется___

journal/reviewing.4_2_При_одобрительной_оценке___

journal/reviewing.4_3_при_общей_положительной_оценке___

journal/reviewing.4_4_В_том_случае_если___

journal/reviewing.4_5_Издательство_вправе_направить___

journal/reviewing.4_6_в_случае_категорического_отклонения___

journal/reviewing.5_Заключительные_положения

journal/reviewing.5_1_рецензия_хранится_в___

journal/reviewing.5_2_при_запросе_со_стороны___